What's the difference between an Art Handler and an Art Installer? The most consequential is how their earnings are calculated.
Art Handlers work with fine art, artifacts, and other high-value pieces that must be handled with care. Earnings are based on time because that payment structure reinforces slow, meticulous work. The slower an art handler works, the more they earn.
Art Installers work with lower-value pieces, which due to timelines, must be installed quickly. Earnings are based on the number of pieces installed because that payment structure reinforces fast work. The faster an art installer works, the more they earn.
With those facts in mind, we created pricing structures for art installation services based on a price per piece (PPP). The average earnings per hour, divided by the average number of pieces installed per hour, yields an average price per piece.
But there's a problem: Some installers charge an high hourly wage for services, and their reasoning for that price is that "they're very fast". However, extrapolating from the postulates above, we know that: The higher the hourly wage, the less the motivation to work quickly. But they'll typically respond that the high amount offsets times when their pay isn't fair - when they're unable to install at their "normal, fast speed", setting up the argument that their time alone has value, as if they were a lawyer. They cite working with designers, installing complex groupings, and being stifled by unscheduled down-time as examples of when they're not being paid fairly.
The solution: Scenarios that result in decreased installer productivity are offset with an increased price per piece. This applies to all work-related situations, such as when working with over-sized or elevated pieces, installing into concrete or plaster, installing in occupied facilities, or working as an "assistant" to interior designer. And what of the unscheduled down-time that's NOT WORK RELATED? If there is no work being performed, because of a situation that isn't work-related, who gets billed for that time? The client? Is that how one shows appreciation?
AIN was founded by a former art provider of 35 years and a former art installer of 15. Our position: In order to maintain control over installation costs and maximize incentives, art providers need installation services to be based on a project's scope, not an installer's time. A PPP compensation structure accomplishes these goals without short-changing installers. Pay based on performance is equitable.
The form below calculates the cost of labor on a per-piece basis in multiple settings and scenarios.
____________________________________________________________